Saturday, July 30, 2011
I still don’t quite understand who really owns the land on Mt. Zion Road, the ancestral home of many of my relatives. Is it the Mingo Tribal Preservation Trust or the Tuscarora Ranch, LLC? Nevertheless, I became quite interested in the Mingo and Tuscarora Indians and their connection with Wilkes County, North Carolina. Therefore, I resorted to the Internet and hard-copy references for information. And this is what I learned…
I found that understanding the difference between the Mingo Indians and the Tuscarora Indians is complicated. As in much literature, different authors tend to have different interpretations of concepts and events. Therefore, my comments represent my assimilations and interpretations of what I have read from various sources.
The Mingo Indians were a small group of Native Americans who were related to the Iroquois Indians. By 1750 they had moved into Ohio and today are often referred to as the Ohio Seneca Indians. I haven’t found any reference to the Mingo Indians in North Carolina.
The Tuscarora Indians, an agricultural tribe that was also related to the Iroquois, inhabited the coastal plans of North Carolina along the Neuse River. As with most of the Native Americans, they were very much opposed to the western expansion of the white settlers. The Tuscarora Indians also developed a very lucrative trade serving as the middlemen in trading rum and other goods with the Indians in the Piedmont region. As a consequence of encroachment by the settlers into their land and mistreatment by the white settlers, a war between the Tuscarora Indians and the settlers erupted in September 1711 and continued through March of 1713 at which time the Indians were defeated. By 1722 many of the Tuscarora Indians returned New York to live with their northern relatives, the Iroquois. Again, I found no documentation of Tuscarora Indians in Wilkes County, North Carolina. Wilkes was inhabited by the Cherokee Indians during those early years.
The connection between the Mingo Indians and the Tuscarora Indians appears to be their blood relationship to the Iroquois Indians.
If any of my followers have additional information regarding these two groups, please comment. As always, I encourage your comments, suggestions, corrections, and information.
Wednesday, July 27, 2011
In my last post I described the land at Stony Fork. In this one I would like to go a step further in the description by telling about the family cemetery plot that is located there.
The farmer who helped us identify the land and cemetery said that it was owned by a Jesse Horton and that “he planned to do something with it.” We didn’t know exactly what this meant. Did he mean the development of a subdivision or some other type of development?
For almost a year, I have been trying to find out who owned the land on which this family cemetery is located and to get in touch with this owner. Even though I searched the White Pages and Yellow Pages on the Internet, called directory assistance for phone numbers, made phone calls, and wrote a letter, I was unable to find the owner. In February 2011, I received a phone call from the one who received my letter. He had been the mail carrier on the Stony Fork/Mt. Zion mail route and had known the Wellborn family very well. He described the nickname that Mr. Wellborn had given him. Of course, these Wellborn heirs would have been a much later generation of Wellborns than those who originally took ownership of the farm. He was extremely helpful in confirming that we had found the location of the farm and that we had identified the site where the farmhouse had been. He described the farmhouse, which burned sometime after 1993, as being a very nice, well-kept, two-story white house. He thought the present owner, Mr. Jesse Horton, who had lived for some time in a double-wide home on the site of the farmhouse, lived in Wilkesboro. I still didn’t know how to reach him!
Oh my! I have gotten sidetracked again, but some additional knowledge about the farm is important to understanding the context of the cemetery. And now, back to the cemetery!
Of course, we assumed that this cemetery plot was the West Family Plot about which CALT had learned from her mother. Recently, with the help of a 4th cousin whom I have met on the Internet (JJL) and Wilkes County cemetery research completed by a 5th cousin 1x removed (GFM), I have learned that this cemetery is the Thomas Land Family Cemetery. William Thomas and Nancy Jane Carlton Land (my 3rd great grandparents) were the parents of Nancy Land West who was the wife of Alexander Balus West and mother of Thomas Harvey West. Many thanks go to JJL and GFM for your help in solving this piece of the puzzle.
As I have researched land documents and, more recently, minutes of church proceedings, I have found that the Wests, Swansons, Witherspoons, Lands, Carltons, McNeils, Fergusons, and Barlows, apparently all lived within close proximity to each other, often owning adjacent properties. As a widow, Nancy Land West bought land from her parents which, of course, went to her only child, Thomas Harvey West.
Likewise, Thomas Harvey’s father, Alexander Balus West, had purchased some of his father’s land (John Balus West). Moreover, Franklin West had purchased some land from his father, John Balus West. Other children of John Balus West may have purchased land from him, also. I just haven’t delved that deeply into the records of Alexander Balus West’s siblings. Therefore, determining who originally owned which parcels of land is extremely difficult.
In retrospect, remember that the parcels of land in this area that belonged to Alexander Balus West/Nancy Land West and their only child, Thomas Harvey West/America Ann McNeil, were traded by Thomas Harvey West for the land in Banner Elk, North Carolina, owned by the G. W. Wellborn family, about 1902.
Furthermore, one may easily see why recent generations thought that the cemetery was the West family plot. In fact, two “known” West children, A. J. West and Willard A. West who were the young children of Thomas Harvey and Nancy Land West, are buried in the Thomas Land Family Cemetery.
According to the Wilkes County Cemetery Database[i] maintained by GFM and JDM, the plot is 75’X50’ with 8 marked graves and approximately 10 unmarked graves. At the time of the verification of the cemetery and graves in 1989, identifiable graves were those of the following: Jane Carlton Land, T. C. “Tommy” Land, Thomas Land, Jim Pennell, Robinett Infant, Molly Land Robinett, A. J. West, and Willard A. West. Some of these tombstones were turned over and/or broken.
During my last visit to Wilkesboro, North Carolina on June 16 and 17, 2011, I was able to determine the present owners of the property on which this cemetery is located. Currently, nearly 5,000 acres of land in the Stony Fork/Mt. Zion community, which likely includes all of the land formerly owned many years ago by the Wests, Swansons, Witherspoons, Lands, Carltons, McNeils, Fergusons, and Barlows, are currently owned by the Tuscarora Ranch, LLC, the grantee, with the grantors being the trustees of the Mingo Tribal Preservation Trust. The trustees are listed as Jesse W. Horton, Jr., Mark R. Ricks, and George R. Wilson.
I have written the Tuscarora Ranch asking permission to repair the fence around the plot and possibly cut back some of the tall grass that covers it. Also, I have asked permission to make periodic visits to the cemetery and to do some minimal maintenance. Cutting back the grass and repairing the fence, along with occasional visits, would indicate that the cemetery has not been forgotten and abandoned. If we are granted this permission, I hope to find some “cousins” who would be willing to help!
Regarding the tall grass – I have recently learned from cousin GFM that the tall grass found on the plot was planted by the owners as, I presume, a means of protection. Cutting the grass only makes it come back thicker. Digging it up would only disturb the graves. Therefore, the best thing to do at the end of winter weather before new growth begins would be to cut it back enough in order to reveal the markers and provide the appearance of being maintained.
Note: In legal documents, the name Wellborn is spelled several different ways (Welborn, Wellborn, Wellborne, Welborne, and Wellbourne). I am using the spelling found in a family historical article written by Homer C. Wellborn, G. W. Wellborn’s son.
Monday, July 25, 2011
After I began researching the West family and reading about Stony Fork and the other areas of family significance, locations such as Glady Branch, Glady Fork, Redy Branch, Lewis Fork, Mason’s Branch, Bull Branch, and Naked Creek, I wanted to visit the Stony Fork area of Wilkes County. In September 2010, two of my 1st cousins 1x removed and a 2nd cousin along with two of our spouses made a day-trip to the valley where Stony Creek winds among the idyllic pastures. Stony Fork Creek runs off the slopes of Tompkins Knob and the Blue Ridge Parkway and quietly makes its way between Dividing Ridge and Elk Ridge and then to the Yadkin River above the Kerr Scott Reservoir. As we explored the area, we were fortunate to discover a large and beautiful waterfall, which almost seemed untouched by human hands. The waterfall was located on the north western end of Stony Fork Road. The waterfall, which drops, according to the Internet, over 200 feet, feeds into Stony Creek and ultimately into the Yadkin River. Since I was on the road above and was too far way, the photograph that I took doesn't do justice to this awesome sight.
Friday, July 22, 2011
He found Indians and danger!
Tradition indicates that many hard-fought battles occurred between the white settlers and the Indians among the swamps along the Yadkin River. The Cherokee Indians were quite numerous and had their capital village at what is known today as North Wilkesboro. They had numerous wigwams along the banks of the Yadkin and Reddies Rivers.
He found an unpopulated back country!
Supposedly, by 1727, no white men had been in what is now Wilkes County. In 1746 Governor Rowan wrote that “in the year of 1746, I was in the territory from the Saxaphaw [Haw River] to the mountains, and there was not above one hundred fighting men in all that back country.” By 1749 according to the tax polls, about 300 taxable men lived west of North Carolina’s Haw River. By 1750, many settlers, most of whom were English, began coming to western North Carolina. As mentioned in a previous blog post, “Migration Routes and Their Effects on Settlements,” settlers came for various reasons—religious, political, and economic. Politically, they came for a desire for greater freedom than they had under British rule in other parts of the colony. Living in such a remote section as western North Carolina provided them with greater autonomy.
He found a source of plenty!
By 1750, the North Carolina “back county” was becoming more populated. As they entered this western North Carolina land, settlers found that many bottom lands had already been cleared by the Indians. In the upper Yadkin River Valley, they found land teaming with bear, deer, and other animals. Supposedly, a hunter could obtain two or three thousand pounds of bear grease in a season. Daniel Boone purportedly killed 99 bears along the waters of Bear Creek. A hunter could kill four or five deer a day.
He found an abundance land available through land grants and purchases!
By 1752 Lord Granville, who did not sell his land back to the King of England as some of the English proprietors had done, provided land grants for 8,773 acres of land lying within the present borders of Wilkes County.
Barclay, Carolyn R. “Just Who Were the Scots-Irish,” Genealogical.com, Aug. 14, 2010
Crouch, John. Historical Sketches of Wilkes County, 1902
Tuesday, July 19, 2011
Most genealogists stress the importance of studying the migration routes of those who settled in specific areas. Until recently, I haven’t given much thought to doing that. However, after reviewing a video presentation, Migration Routes and Settlement Patterns, 1607-1890, by Dr. George F. Schweitzer, Ph.D., ScD, copyright 1998, I have become more interested in these migration patterns and how they may have influenced my ancestors who moved into the high country of North Carolina. Not only do I have West ancestors including the Lands/Carltons, McNeils/Barlows, Swansons, and Witherspoons from those high country counties of Wilkes and Avery, but also the Hugheses/Hoilmans and Honeycutts/Canipes from the high country counties of Yancey and Mitchell, all of whom may have followed those routes as they sought, for one reason or another, new land. Wow! What a daunting challenge I have if, and when, I am able to research these families!
Before continuing with the migration routes and their effects on settlements, a basic explanation of the Appalachian Mountains, is needed. Using Internet sources, I have researched the Appalachian Mountains, the Allegheny Mountains, the Blue Ridge Mountains, and the Cumberland Mountains and have discovered that different writers provide facts and names that somewhat differ. Therefore, sorting out, synthesizing, and organizing the information in my mind has been somewhat difficult. In view of the fact that I am still learning about the geography of the land, the migration routes, and the settlement patterns, I must provide a disclaimer that I may have some inaccuracies or misinterpretations. Please let me know if you notice any in my analyses.
The Appalachian Mountains, representing a very old and vast system of mountains in the eastern section of North America, are found in this country in 18 of our states. The Allegheny Mountain range is on the western side, the Blue Ridge Mountain range on the eastern side, and the Great Appalachian Valley, as it is called, in the middle. A portion of this valley in the middle is known today as the Shenandoah River Valley and is bounded on its eastern side by the Blue Ridge Mountains and on its western side by the eastern front of the Ridge-and-Valley Appalachians excluding Massanutten Mountain which runs down the middle. The Cumberland Mountain, with its famous Cumberland Gap, is part of the southern Blue Ridge range of Appalachians. From the beginning of human existence in the region, the Appalachian Mountains have presented barriers to east-west travel. They are made up of ridges and valleys which present opposition to any road running from east to west.
Origin of the West Name
Also, as a preface to the discussion of the routes and settlements, let’s look at the origin of the name “West.” The name, West, is an English surname with its roots in Western Europe. Presently, it is predominantly found in Australia, the United Kingdom, the United States, and New Zealand in that order. In the United States in ranking order from greatest to least, it is most predominate in Tennessee, Arkansas, Delaware, Georgia, and Mississippi (World Names Profiler, 2011: http://www.publicprofiler.org/worldnames). I was quite surprised that the name is not present in significant numbers in Virginia, North Carolina, and some of the New England states.
Therefore, considering the fact that the name is of English origin, we may assume that the West ancestors came from England. Furthermore, we may assume that they entered the colonies at one of the main entry points at which most English immigrants entered during the colonial era of 1607-1700.
Migration Routes and Settlement Patterns
According to Dr. Schweitzer during the period of history between 1607 and 1890, the English settled in Virginia in 1607, in Massachusetts in 1620, and in Maryland in 1634. Many moved from Massachusetts to Maine in the 1630s, from Connecticut to Rhode Island in 1636, to New Hampshire in 1638, and to New York, Delaware, and New Jersey in 1664. They moved from Virginia into northeast North Carolina in the 1670s, into South Carolina in 1670, into Pennsylvania in 1682, and into Georgia in 1733. Mobley (Joe A. Mobley, ed., The Way We Lived in North Carolina before 1770, copyright 1983) stated that Europeans had explored the coasts and the mountains of North Carolina before the event of the Lost Colony in Virginia. Prior to 1715, the first permanent settlers in North Carolina were from Virginia.
Why did so many immigrants move into the areas of western Virginia and North Carolina? Religious, political, and economic reasons provided this motivation to seek out other land. At this point, I won’t explore the political and religious reasons, of which apparently several existed, but will focus on the economic. Beginning in 1727, cheap land in the fertile valley that ran along the eastern side of the Appalachian Mountains (the Blue Ridge range) lured settlers into that valley, the Shenandoah River valley (the Shenandoah Valley). Compton (Brenda E. McPherson Compton, The Scots-Irish from Ulster and the Great Philadelphia Wagon Road, http://www.learnnc.org/lp/editions/nchist-colonial/2038) stated that in 1750, a 50-acre farm in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania cost 7 pounds 10 shillings. Whereas, in the Granville District of North Carolina, which comprised the upper half of the state, a 100-acre farm cost 5 shillings. Therefore, for these economic reasons, one can readily understand the desire of people to move to this cheaper land.
According to historians, the rugged Appalachian Mountain ranges, with the Allegheny Mountain range on the west and the Blue Ridge Mountain range on the east, permitted passage only at four locations. These passes were a pass in the Mohawk Valley in New York between the Adirondack Mountains and Catskill Mountains, a pass in Pennsylvania at a location near the present-day Gettysburg, a pass through the southern Blue Ridge range (some writers indicate that this was in the Allegheny range) at the Cumberland Gap on the borders of present-day Kentucky, Tennessee and Virginia, and the southern route around one or both ranges of the Appalachian Mountains.
According to Dr. Schweitzer, between the years of 1700-1763, the land on the eastern side of the Appalachian Mountains was settled up to the Appalachian Mountains. The Virginia and North Carolina Piedmont area was settled from the east by the English and Scots-Irish. The Spanish and the Indians, who were armed by the Spanish, kept settlers from South Carolina at that time. The route that led the settlers through the Shenandoah Valley from Philadelphia to its southern end at Sapling Grove (present-day Bristol, Virginia) was known as the Great Wagon Road or the Philadelphia Wagon Road with various sections of the route given additional names. The portion of the Great Wagon Road that extended to the west toward Kentucky beyond “Sapling Grove” was named the Wilderness Road. According to Beverly Whitaker, 2006 (http://home.roadrunner.com), 90% of Kentucky’s population in 1790 had arrived on the Wilderness Road. The settlers filled the valley to Tennessee and then left it through the passes into the uplands of Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina, which, I assume, must have been up through the Great Appalachian Valley. Today’s Interstate 81 follows the general route of the Great Wagon Road/Philadelphia Wagon Road/Great Valley Road from Philadelphia down the Shenandoah Valley to Sapling Grove and on to Georgia.
Prior to 1763, the French and hostile Indians, who were armed by the French, had prevented any settlement across the Appalachian Mountains. With the defeat of the French in the French and Indian War, England was given Canada and all of the land to the Mississippi River, and the Indians were driven back. By 1763-83, the settlers began moving from Maryland, Virginia, and North Carolina through the Cumberland Gap into Kentucky; from Virginia, North Carolina, and Maryland down the Shenandoah Valley on the Great Wagon Road into northeast Tennessee; and from other areas of the colonies traveling down the Great Wagon Road, going through the passes, or continuing on down and around the Appalachians on the southern route.
Back to Alexander West I
Now back to the Alexander West I, the likely progenitor of this line of the Wests of Wilkes. He was probably born between 1720 and 1730. His sons Alexander West II (b 1751) and John West (b 1760) were both born in Orange County, North Carolina. He appeared on a 1755 tax list in North Carolina in Surry (later Wilkes) County, as living in 1778 at Glady Branch and on the north side of the Yadkin River in Wilkes County, as living in 1779 in Wilkes County, on a tax list in 1782 for Wilkes County, and as living in 1784 on land at Glady Fork, all of which were land at the foot of the Blue Ridge range of the eastern Appalachians. If, indeed, he had been from Virginia, what migration route did he follow? Did he come from Virginia with the wave of English who settled North Carolina between 1700 and 1763? Had his parents moved from Virginia to Maryland or Delaware from which he migrated to North Carolina in the mid-1700s?
We still don’t have an answer to who Alexander West I was or where he came from. We have only the passed-down, oral family history indicating that he was the father of Alexander West II and John West, thus, the progenitor of this line of Wests of Wilkes County.
The spellings of the various locations (Glady Branch, Glady Fork) are spelled as they are written in the legal documents.
Monday, July 18, 2011
Thanks to those of you who have checked out this blog. As of today, I have about 100 hits, but, of course, I don’t know by whom. I really would like to hear from you either by your posting a comment on the blog or e-mailing me directly. Most of you probably have my personal e-mail address since I have corresponded with many of you. I want the blog to be a venue for conversation and communication among the many of us who are descendants of Alexander West I or among those who are just interested.
Your comment may be positive or negative; I am open-minded and receptive to either. You may have additional information, corrections, or an interesting story. You may have questions about some of the content and would like further clarification. You may suggest another avenue for exploration through research. Let me hear from you! Thanks.
Tuesday, July 12, 2011
Early land, tax, and census records of Orange County, North Carolina, indicate evidence of two John Wests, who are listed in different ways (John West, John West, Sr., John Sen West, John West, Jr., and John Junior West) in Orange County, NC, which was probably in the area of the Hillsborough District: Stoney Creek (another Stony Creek, not the one in Wilkes County), Crab Tree Creek, and Haw River.
These Orange County records also indicate evidence of an Alexander West who was probably the Alexander West born about 1720-1730, who could be the same Alexander who was the progenitor, of this West line of Wilkes County.
· John West, Sr. is listed as grantor of land to Alexander West, the grantee, between 1752-1768.
· John West and Alexander West are recorded in a land survey on Stoney Creek waters of Haw River in 1754.
· Alexander West is noted in the NC Early Census Index in Orange County in 1755.
· In 1769 in Orange County, Isaac West, presumed son of John West, married Susanna Anderson, the daughter of Peter and Catherine Anderson.
· 1787 land records indicate that Peter Anderson and his wife, Catherine, sold land on Stoney Creek which was adjacent to John West Senior.
· These early Orange County records also indicate the presence of a Solomon West.
The following evidence from Wilkes County census, tax, and land records supports the presence of Alexander West in Wilkes County:
· In 1755, Surry County and Wilkes County Taxables, references two Alexander Wests listed as taxables: Allexander West, Allexander West. Since part of Surry became Wilkes in 1771, the land would have been in Surry County at the time of the 1755 survey.
· In 1778, Alexander West is noted in land entry books of Wilkes County as receiving land on Glady Branch.
· In 1778, Alexander West is noted as living adjacent to William Triplett on north side of Yadkin River. [Stony Creek in Wilkes County feeds into the Yadkin River.]
· In 1779, Alexander West is noted as receiving land on north side of a branch which ran through John Farbusons [Ferguson’s?] plantation.
· In 1783, Alexander West is noted as being taxed for 30 acres, 0 Negroes, 2 mules/horses, 6 cattle in Capt. Kee’s District.
· In 1784, Alexander West is noted as living adjacent to Daniel Sutherlin on Glady Fork.
· In 1787, Alexander West is noted as receiving a land grant for 50 acres on both sides of Glady Fork with Isaac West and Bray Crisp serving as chain carriers [Was this Isaac West one of his sons or a brother? If he were a son, did Alexander name him Isaac after a brother? Also, as an item of interest, I have been told by another on-line researcher that a Bray Crisp is noted at a later date in the South Carolina census records as living near a John West. Did Bray Crips move to South Carolina along with some of the Wests? So many questions!]
In the 1790 Burke County Census Alexander West Senior is noted in the household with 2 free white males over 16 who would have been himself and his son Alexander West II (1751-1834). Since he did not appear in this household in the 1800 census, one may assume that he died between 1790 and 1800.
Since an Alexander West appears along with John West, Sr. in land surveys and transactions, loosely documented assumptions may be made that John West, Sr. was the father of John West, Jr., Alexander West I, Solomon West, and Isaac West. But, where is Alexander in the genealogies?
I cannot sort it all out! I am so confused! Could two different Alexander Wests have lived so close together with so many common events during the same period of time? If this supposition is valid, from which relative was the naming pattern for our Alexander established? Was there not a common ancestor named Alexander? Even Solomon West, who is a member of a supposedly unrelated line of Wests, named his son, Alexander who was born in 1776.
You can readily see my frustration. I hope that someone can provide a clue to solve this mystery.
Friday, July 8, 2011
Those of us who are descended from Alexander West I are only assuming, based on handed-down family history, that we are descended from him. Unless someone has additional information which provides primary documentation, we are basing our connection to him on the oral family history of which only two individuals, of whom I am aware, have recorded for posterity. I am extremely grateful to these two, John Foster West and Irene Hendrix Basey, who recorded family history that had been passed down to them. Both of these individuals also referenced our forefather, John West (son of Alexander West I), about whom we also know so little. Without their efforts, we would not have anything on which to base our heritage prior to John Balus West.
John Foster West (descended from Alexander West I through John West, John Balus West, John Witherspoon West, and John Wilson West), a noted author and professor at Appalachian State University, wrote an article, “History of West Family Is Given,” which appeared in the November 8, 1976, issue of the Journal-Patriot of North Wilkesboro, North Carolina. He described Alexander West I as being “the deep taproot of many who still live in Wilkes, Caldwell, and Watauga counties as well as across the nation.” He also described John West who moved to South Carolina shortly after his marriage to Margaret “Peggy” Witherspoon. He related the story of “Miss Peggy,” as he said she was affectionately called, returning to Wilkes with her children after John’s early death to live in the “area where her father-in-law, Alexander West I, lived.” Furthermore, in another newspaper article, “West Writes About Revolutionary War Relative,” for which the publication source and date are unknown, John Foster West identifies himself as being the sixth generation from Alexander West I. In this article he described his great, great grandfather, Alexander West II, who fought in the American Revolution, and he identified him as the son of Alexander West I and the brother of John West. Unfortunately, Alexander West II’s Revolutionary War Pension papers indicate that no names of parents were given. John Foster West passed away in 2008.
In the 1982 publication of The Heritage of Wilkes County, Irene Hendrix Basey, who is descended from Alexander West I through John West, John Balus West, and Franklin West, published an article, “The West Family,” in which she named Alexander West I as “the earliest known ancestor of the West families of Wilkes County.” Likewise, she described John West’s family, telling how his widow, Margaret, returned to Wilkes after his death “to live near her relatives in the same general neighborhood where Alexander West I had lived prior to his settlement on Upper Little River.” Irene Hendrix Basey’s daughter has posted Mrs. Basey’s family tree, Basey Family, on Ancestry.com. I had tried for a year to locate Mrs. Basey and certainly appreciate Irene’s daughter recently helping me make the connection and sharing information with me. What would we do without those dear souls who are willing to help and to share information!
Many thanks to 2nd cousin, DFK, and 4th cousins LBD and JJL for sharing information.
Many thanks to 2nd cousin, DFK, and 4th cousins LBD and JJL for sharing information.
Even though, we are basing our knowledge of our ancestors on “assumptions,” I believe that these assumptions are valid for several reasons. Recorded oral history has validity and value and should be respected. Naming patterns in families reflect the recurring use of the name Alexander in their descendants. After Alexander West I, we find his son Alexander West II, who named a son Alexander West III. John Balus West, the grandson of Alexander West I, named a son Alexander Balus West. John Balus West also had a great grandson named Alexander T. West. Furthermore, I suspect that two of the sons of Thomas Harvey West (son of Alexander Balus West/Nancy Land) and America Ann McNeil West may have had Alexander in their names. These sons, A. Judson West and Willard A. West, died at early ages with A. Judson living only approximately two months and Willard A. most likely living only about two years. In addition, Solomon West, who may have been a brother of Alexander West I, named his son Alexander West.
Obviously, we who are descended from “The Wests of Wilkes” are in need of primary sources with which to document our heritage. Obviously, I have reached, as genealogist say, “a brick wall” in my search for our ancestors. I have researched land, census, birth, marriage, will, and probate records in the county court houses and libraries of Orange, Surry, Wilkes, and Burke. I have also researched at the State Library of North Carolina in Raleigh and the State Library of Virginia in Richmond. Through this blog, I have hopes that I may reach someone who has greater knowledge than I do about the West ancestors, particularly, John West and his father, Alexander West I.
My intentions are to keep my posts short, but I have just gotten carried away with this and the previous one.
Thursday, July 7, 2011
So much confusion exists regarding the ancestors of Alexander West I. Owners of many on-line trees are confused by the many John Wests and Alexander Wests and have mingled those from various trees or sources with the descendants of Alexander West I (unknown spouse) who was the father of Alexander West II (married Hannah Langley) and John West (married Margaret “Peggy” Witherspoon). This post will attempt to present an overview of the major sources of confusion and draw conclusions based on research data.
Some researchers believe (as I once did) that this West line descended from the royalty of Colonial Virginia, specifically from Sir Thomas Leighton, the 2nd Lord Baron, De La Warr West (1557-1602) and his wife Lady Anne Knollys as outlined in the following male lineage: Sir Thomas Leighton (1557-1602)/Lady Anne Knollys; Governor John West I (1590-1659)/Lady Anne Percy; Colonel John West II/Ursula Unity Croshaw; and John West III (1676-1734)/Judith Armistead. However, this is where the “dead-end” occurs because John and Judith West had only one child, a son, Major Charles West, who never married and died without issue. Charles willed his 4000 acre inheritance, West Point, Virginia, to his first cousin, Thomas West, who was the son of Charles’ uncle, Captain Thomas West.
Another scenario, one that is not presented in any on-line trees which connect with the Wests of Wilkes, is that the son of Colonel John West II and his mistress, the Pamunkey Indian Queen, Cockacoeske (1640-1686), could have provided a link to my West family. Their son was also named John (abt 1657-1713) and is referenced in some documents as John, the Indian, West. I have seen him referenced in some on-line trees as Josiah John West. The story of Queen Cockacoeske and her role in the Treaty of the Middle Plantation of 1677 provides interesting reading. Supposedly, John, the Indian, West married Elizabeth Rose in 1677 and had several sons (possibly Thomas, Robert, Benjamin, and Richard). They lived in the area of Chowan, North Carolina. Thomas was born before 1700 and died about 1800. He had a son John born in 1762 who had a son John born in 1786. Robert died in 1898; he supposedly had sons named Robert, Thomas, John, and Richard. Research regarding this family has been limited and confusing, but the names and dates do not lend credibility to any of the sons being the father of a John West (b abt 1703) or an Alexander West (b abt 1720-1730), who were the ancestors of my West family.
A second area for confusion with many researchers is one regarding the Wests of Accomack, Virginia, on the Eastern Shore. In 1649 Anthony West and his wife Ann Barloe Huffe along with their two children, John and Katherine, were transported by Randall Herle to the Eastern Shore from Jamestown. In 1649 Herle received a patent of 600 acres for transporting 12 individuals among whom were the four Wests. This was the first recorded record of any Wests on the Eastern Shore. Records indicate that Anthony West first came to the Virginia Colony as an indentured servant or as an apprentice. He returned to England where he married Ann Barloe Huffe and then returned to Jamestown. In addition to John and Katherine, Anthony and Ann Barloe Huffe West had two more daughters after they came to live at Accomack. Their son, John West (1638-1703), became known as Colonel John West who married Matilda Scarburgh/Scarborough. This John West is often confused with the Colonel John West of Jamestown. Colonel John West of Accomack and his wife Matilda had fourteen children six of whom were males. The list below provides the names of their sons, their grandsons, their great grandsons, and their known spouses for several generations.
As one examines these John and Alexander Wests, one must keep in mind their dates. A John West (1707-abt 1800) and his wife, Mary Madden, have been suggested as parents of Alexander West I (abt 1720/30-bef 1790)/unknown spouse. Also, the Alexander West, ancestor of the Wests of Wilkes, North Carolina, was alive and active between the years of 1752 and 1790 as noted in land and census records of Orange, Surry, Wilkes, and Burke counties of North Carolina. Please note that the land in Surry and Wilkes counties where Alexander West I had lived was the same land. Initially, the land was part of Surry County (created in 1771), but when Wilkes County was created in 1777 from Surry and the District of Washington, the land became part of Wilkes County.
And now, back to the male descendants of Colonel John West and Matilda Scarburgh/Scarborough West.
· John, the Elder, West (d bef 1708), no children;
· Anthony West (d bef 1717)/Elizabeth Rowles
o Anthony West (abt 1700 – 1778)/Comfort Rogers
§ Richard West (abt 1727-1788)/Ann
§ John West (abt 1788-Oct 1799)/unknown spouse
· Anthony West (abt 1776-?)
§ Jeremiah West (1735-1793)
· William West
· John West
o John West (1696-bef 30 Nov 1773)/unknown spouse
§ Anthony West (d 1778)/Elenor (Eleanor)
· Revel West/Susannah
o John Rowles West/unknown spouse
o Revell West/Margaret C.
o Edmond Revell West/unknown spouse
· George West/unknown spouse
o George R. West
· Isaac West/unknown spouse
o John West
· John West
· Alexander West* (1665 Accomack-1727 Accomack)/1st Bayly; 2nd Mary Robinson Hurtley
o Child with daughter of Richard Bayly:
§ Scarburgh West (abt 1700-1760)/ Mary?
· Edmund West (abt 1726-1797)
· Alexander West (abt 1730-26 May 1761 in Accomack)/Judah
· Philip Parker West (abt 1732-18 Oct 1796)/Elizabeth
o Children with Mary Robinson Hurtley:
§ Major West (abt 1707 - ?)
§ Edmund West (abt 1710 - ?)
§ John West (abt 1695-Jan 1755)/Agnes Burton
· John West (abt 1728 Accomack - ?)
· Major West (abt 1705-bef 30 Oct 1782)
o John West (abt 1775 Accomack- bef 28 Mar 1814 Accomack)
· Jonathan West (1674- bef 4 Oct 1727)/unknown Spooner
· Benony (Benoni) West (d bef. 1 Feb 1708)/Sarah Snead
· Major John, the Younger, West (d 1718)/Frances Yeardley
o Argall (Argol) Yeardley (Yardly) West/Comfort
§ John West
o John West/Ann Godwin
§ Jonathan West
· Jonathan West II/Anne Simpson
o John West
§ John Custis West
o Thorowgood West/Susanna
o Jonathan West III/Susanna
o Thomas West
§ Charles West
§ James West/Tabitha
· Solomon West
· Samuel West
o Robinson West
§ Thomas West
§ William West
o William West
o Thorowgood West
o Charles West**/Elizabeth
§ Jonathan West
· Charles West
Some believe that these Wests of Accomack were related to the Wests of Jamestown. However, no one has been able to prove any familial relationship between the two families of John Wests (Colonial Governor John West and his son, Colonel John West of Jamestown and the Colonel John West of Accomack). One compelling artifact which lends credence to this theory that a familial relationship may exist is the tombstone of Charles West**, son of Major John, the Younger, West. This tombstone is inscribed with the De La Warr coat of arms. In his will, Charles had left instructions that a headstone with this crest be ordered from England and placed on his grave. The tombstone had been removed from the grave at some point in time and was used as a bucket rest at a well. It was retrieved a number of years ago and stored in a museum. It is broken and not well preserved, being on display on the basement floor of the Ker Place, Onancock, Virginia. The Ker Place is a museum and the home of the Accomack Historical Society (http://www.kerplace.org/). Although, this tombstone is inscribed with the De La Warr coat of arms, no one has been able to prove that these Accomack Wests were related to the English royalty Wests of Jamestown. Was Charles only “a want-a-be,” or did he know something we don’t – that his family was related to West royalty? However, after having seen and read about this tombstone in reference books, I was excited to view and photograph it myself while I was in Accomack in May 2010.
Confusion exists among noted authors, who have complied and published court and land records, concerning the heirs of Alexander West* (1665-1727) with one source indicating no heirs and another indicating two male heirs. Since authorities do not always agree, determining lineages and relationships becomes a difficult task. Of course, we are looking 340+ years back in time! Perhaps, I expect too much.
Good genealogical research does not start at the earliest ancestor and work toward the most recent one but starts at the most recent ancestor and works back proving everything with reliable, primary sources. I certainly found this out the hard way. When I first started my research, I did it the wrong way by starting with those Wests from the colonial days and working forward using published books as my sources. Was I ever wrong!
I did use published resources as I tried to unravel the John and Alexander Wests of Accomack. I spent the fall and winter months of 2009-2010 researching various references written by noted authorities by borrowing the books from my public library and through inter-library loan. In May 2010, I spent two days in Accomack, Virginia, researching the Wests of Accomack in the Eastern Shore Public Library, which is the county library for Accomack County, and in the Accomack County Court House. At this point, I wish to express thanks to my sister who helped me with the research in Accomack and to my husband and brother-in-law who tagged along with us in support of our efforts! We had a great time, too, touring the part of the Delmarva Peninsula that is in Virginia and seeing the ponies at Chincoteague.
As a matter of reference, most of the genealogical data described in this post regarding the Wests of Accomack were taken from the following sources:
· Miles Files 11.0, http://espl-genealogy.org/MilesFiles/
· Myer, Virginia M. and John Frederick Dorman. Adventurers of Purse and Person, Virginia, 1607-1624/5. Richmond, VA: Dietz Press Inc.
· Nottingham, Stratton. Wills and Administrations of Accomac County, Vol. I, 1663-1800. Bowie, MD: Heritage Books, Inc., 1990.
· West, Elmer D. Some Descendants of Anthony West of Accomack, Virginia, 1980.
· Whitelaw, Ralph T. Virginia's Eastern Shore, A History of Northampton and Accomack Counties, Vol I, 1951.
· Whitelaw, Ralph T. Virginia's Eastern Shore, A History of Northampton and Accomack Counties, Volumes I and II. Gloucester, Mass: Peter Smith, 1968.
In conclusion to this discourse of the Wests of Accomack, one might assume that Alexander West (1720/30-bef 1790) could be the ancestor of this line of Wests. However, the Alexander West from Accomack died on 26 May 1761. The Alexander West in this lineage of Wests is noted in land and census documents as living in Orange, Surry, Wilkes, and Burke counties of North Carolina during the period of 1752-1790. Therefore, the Alexander West of Accomack who was married to Judah could not have been the ancestor of this line of Wests. No direct male line is found to indicate that Alexander West (1720/30-bef 1790) is directly descended from a West of Accomack.
And then, there’s another story…which adds to the confusion! A Robert West (1612-1646) has been documented as playing “nine pins” at the home of John Dennis in Accomack in 1636. At one point in time, he supposedly worked on a plantation, which may have been in the Jamestown area, owned by Lady Elizabeth Throgmorten Dale (Mrs. Thomas Dale) and could have been an indentured servant, an apprentice, or an orphan. Supposedly, he first married an Elizabeth and had one son, George West who, subsequently, had four sons. His second wife with whom he had no children was a widow named Mary Rayne who died in 1649. Robert West and Elizabeth’s descendants are listed below.
· Robert West (1612-1646)/1st: Elizabeth
o George West (1639 VA - 1702 DE)/married 1st: Susannah;
married 2nd: widow DuParkes, on 28 Mar 1688, no children
George West and Susannah had 4 sons which are listed below along with their offspring:
§ Thomas West (aft 1660, Accomack, VA – 1708 Somerset County, MD – present Sussex, DE), married Elizabeth
· Robert West, married Elizabeth Lewis
o Lewis West
o Peter West
o John West
o Joseph West
o Robert West
o Wrixam West
· Samuel West
· Thomas West
· John West (b aft 1700, Baltimore Hundred, Somerset, MD - ?)
· George West
o 2 unknown children
· William West
§ John West (aft 1660 – abt 1708 Somerset County, MD)
§ Robert West
§ George West
After an examination of the data regarding Robert West, the only possibility of a connection might be with his grandson, John West, who was born after 1700 in Maryland. He was the son of Thomas West, one of Robert’s sons. Could this have been the John West who was married to a Mary Madden? Looking back at my research data regarding a John West, Sr. and a John West, Jr., a John West, Sr. is recorded in land and census records of Orange County, North Carolina, between 1752 and 1785. Could he be “The One”?